In my new book, The Kingdom of the Antichrist, I present a new end-time paradigm. Because this paradigm is so new, and because of where we find ourselves in the prophetic time clock, I thought it would be helpful if I created a blog to help the Church in tracking The Rise of the Beast - the fourth empire of the book of Daniel which, ultimately, will become The Kingdom of the Antichrist. It is, therefore, assumed that those who are interested in participating in this blog have read my book and, as a consequence, have an understanding of the new paradigm it contains. A new paradigm which is being revealed on a daily basis in our nightly news.
April 9, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

In my new book, Kingdom of the Antichrist, I demonstrate how the final eschatological battle[s] will be literally fault over the Temple Mount. Indeed, the “abomination that casuses desolation” event, where the Antichrist proclaims himself to be God while setting in God’s Temple, takes place, obviously, within the newly rebuilt Jewish Temple atop Mount Moriah. Consequently, not only are we, here at www.KingdomOfTheAntichrist.com, keeping a close eye on political events in and around the Holy Land in anticipation of the War of Gog and Magog, but we are also keeping a close eye on events going on in and around the Temple Mount. Consequently, news reports out of Israel on Sunday revealed that its security forces recently captured a Hamas terrorist cell operating out of Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.

The five-man cell had been behind a string of recent stone and firebomb attacks on and around the Temple Mount. Nine Israeli police officers were wounded last month in one of the firebomb attacks. Materials to make the firebombs were smuggled onto the Temple Mount by Arab children, whom the terrorists knew were less likely to be searched by Israeli security. The terrorists said they were motivated by alleged Israeli efforts to “Judaize” the Temple Mount (hint: it is already Judaism’s holiest site for well over 3,000 years).

They also took issue with so-called desecration of the Koran at the Temple Mount. The incident they were referring to involved an Israeli police officer who last month moved a chair, causing a Koran to fall onto the floor. (That last sentence is not a joke.)

Events in and around the Holy Land, including Turkey (Gog and MaGog), Syria, Egypt, Libya, Iran, Afganistan, Iraq and other Northern Africa and Middle Eastern states are heating up exponentially, as are events in and around the Temple Mount area. Stay tuned, it promises to be an exciting summer.

March 24, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

The end time war of Great Tribulation spoken of by our Lord (Matt 24) between His Church and the infamous Fourth Beast of the book of Daniel (Dan 7) begun centuries ago but, after decades of dormancy has, since the 9/11 attack, begun to pick up momentum in third-world countries as well as in most Islamic countries.  A report recently came out of Nigeria regarding Islamic attacks on Roman Catholic Churches there which highlights the growing frequency and brutality of this prophesied War of Great Tribulation.

 

A Roman Catholic priest reports that 50 out of 52 Catholic Churches in Nigeria’s Maiduguri Diocese have been destroyed.

According to a report by on Shoebat.com, Father Jerome Ituah of Christ the King Catholic Parish in Kurudu said the buildings have been knocked down, but the people are not discouraged. 

“You would always see them worshiping under rain and sun in open places at the site of their destroyed places of worship,” Ituah said, according to the report.

Heritage Foundation Africa Analyst Steven Bucci said that the numbers are consistent with the goals of Boko Haram, a jihadist militant group in Nigeria.

“They have been targeting Catholics and evangelicals right along. They are dedicated to spreading Islam by any means, and they prefer the bloodiest ways available,” Bucci said.

News of the destruction of 50 churches follows only weeks after it was reported that a Nigerian general proposed amnesty for some members of Boko Haram.

According to the report, “The national coordinator of Nigeria’s counter-terrorism center said the government is willing to embrace members of the militant group who renounce terrorism, Nigeria’s Daily Trust reported Tuesday.”

The report added, “Nigerian counter-terrorism chief Major Gen. Sarkin-Yaki Bello said the government would adopt some socio-economic measure to address extremism in the north and grant amnesty to members of Boko Haram.”

A report of an amnesty offer stands in sharp contrast to Boko Haram’s rejection of a call for peace. As WND reported last summer, the group answered “no.”

Human rights group International Christian Concern is reporting that gunmen stormed a Nigerian church in the town of Ottie and killed 19 people.

According to witnesses at the church, the method of attack and the tactics closely follow the operational methods of Boko Haram.

In a statement for the press, ICC reported that a Nigerian Christian leader who asked not to be identified put the blame completely on the jihadi group.

“Members of Boko Haram are killing Christians. They want to Islamize the North. Their targets are Christians, the security men and the police. Many Christians have already left the North,” the Christian leader said. “For those of us remaining in the North, we worship under the heavy presence of the military. The time the church was attacked was because the service was held on Monday.”

Bucci added that he’s not sure if the Nigerian government is even willing to stop Boko Haram.

International Christian Concern’s Africa specialist, William Stark, said that while he can’t vouch for the time period, destroying Catholic churches is part of Boko Haram’s method of operation.

“I do believe the recent attacks against Christians and foreigners in Nigeria have told us a lot about Boko Haram. From the outside, it looks like Boko Haram may be fracturing into different groups,” Stark said.

He said a short-lived ceasefire shows a rift in the ranks.

“Last month’s ceasefire agreement showed that there is a fracture between Boko Haram members that are ready to end the insurgency and others that are not willing to call a peace,” Stark said. “Also, this new group (Ansaru) that is targeting foreigners vs. Nigerians shows a new splinter group.”

Stark said changing names or groups won’t end the violence.

“Whether these groups continue to fracture or not, Christians will still be persecuted. There seems to be an agreement between all of the groups that Nigeria’s north shouldn’t allow Christians to exist and worship freely,” Stark said.

Former PLO operative turned Islam analyst and peace activist Walid Shoebat warned, “Look for the Islamic persecution of Christians in Nigeria – courtesy of Boko Haram – to increase.”

March 22, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

DUBAI (Reuters) – Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned on Thursday that the Islamic Republic would destroy the Israeli cities of Tel Aviv and Haifa if its nuclear infrastructure came under attack from the Jewish state.

Israel puts little stock in big power negotiations aimed at curbing Iran’s uranium enrichment – which Western nations suspect is a conduit to nuclear weapons capability – and has repeatedly hinted at pre-emptive war against its arch-enemy.

During a visit to Israel on Thursday, U.S. President Barack Obama acknowledged its security concerns, saying, “America will do what we must to prevent a nuclear Iran.” But he also said big powers believed there was still time for a diplomatic solution.

Russia said Iran and six global powers made headway in expert-level talks this week to ease the 10-year-long standoff over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, but the risk of backsliding towards confrontation remained.

Higher-level political talks between the powers and Iran are to resume in the Kazakh city of Almaty early next month, part of a concerted effort to avert another Middle East war that could balloon oil prices and wreak havoc on the global economy.

Khamenei, in a televised speech marking the Iranian new year, said: “At times the officials of the Zionist regime (Israel) threaten to launch a military invasion but they themselves know that if they make the slightest mistake the Islamic Republic will raze Tel Aviv and Haifa to the ground.”

But the top Shi’ite Muslim cleric, Iran’s most powerful figure, dismissed any threat from Israel, describing it as “not big enough to stand out among the Iranian nation’s enemies”.

The standoff now turns on Iran’s enrichment of uranium to a fissile purity of 20 percent, which the West sees as a big step towards processing the material for use in nuclear bombs. Tehran says 20 percent enrichment will yield solely fuel for a medical research reactor, and that its nuclear quest is wholly peaceful.

“We have told you numerous times that we are not after nuclear weapons,” Khamenei said, addressing Washington in front of thousands of adoring faithful who had come to the Imam Reza Shrine in Mashhad to hear him speak.

COOL TO DIRECT U.S.-IRANIAN CONTACT

He responded coolly to recent U.S. suggestions of direct talks between the two countries, which have had no diplomatic relations since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution and the ensuing hostage crisis involving American diplomats in Tehran.

“I am not optimistic about these talks. Why? Because our past experiences show that talks for the American officials do not mean for us to sit down and reach a logical solution … What they mean by talks is that we sit down and talk until Iran accepts their viewpoint,” the top Shi’ite Muslim cleric said.

“I am not optimistic about their comments but I am not opposed either,” he said adding that the solution to the issue was “close-by and easy” if only the United States genuinely wanted to reach an agreement.

Touching on a central Iranian demand, Khamenei called for Iran’s “natural right” to enrich uranium for nuclear energy to be recognised by the world. Western powers have refused on the grounds that Iran has hidden nuclear work from U.N. inspectors in the past and not opened up to their investigations.

At technical-level talks in Istanbul on Monday, the six powers gave Iran more details of proposals made in Almaty where they offered Tehran modest sanctions relief if it curbed its most sensitive nuclear activity.

“This progress is real but it is not sufficient to speak of a definitive shift,” Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, Moscow’s chief negotiator, told reporters.

“We cannot say this progress is irreversible. This alarms us a little, but from round to round, we have a more and more businesslike discussion of all the issues.”

LIMITED CONCESSIONS ON OFFER

Western officials have said the offer entailed an easing of a ban on trade in gold and other precious metals as well as an import embargo on Iranian petrochemical products.

In exchange, a senior U.S official said, Iran would among other things have to suspend uranium enrichment to the fissile concentration of 20 percent at its Fordow underground facility and “constrain the ability to quickly resume operations there”.

Iran has been wary, suggesting that the powers are asking for concessions more significant than they have offered Tehran.

Obama, in a speech to Israeli university students, said “strong and principled diplomacy” remained the best way to ensure that Iran eschewed nuclear weapons.

“We know that there remains time to pursue a diplomatic resolution …with the sense of urgency that is required. But Iran must know this time is not unlimited,” he said.

“Iran must not get a nuclear weapon. This is not a danger that can be contained. I have said to the world that all options are on the table for achieving our objectives,” Obama added, alluding to last-resort military action.

Israeli cabinet minister Silvan Shalom, asked whether Israeli and U.S. timelines for action on Iran were converging, told Israel Radio: “He (Obama) also knows that there is a target date for the matter of attacking Iran to deny it nuclear weapons. He knows it, and we know it.”

KHAMENEI: IRAN WON’T BUCKLE TO PRESSURE

Khamenei said Iran’s struggles over the past year against international sanctions imposed over its contested nuclear programme resembled a battle and that its enemies had confessed to trying to “cripple the Iranian nation”.

“What happened last year, we need to learn a lesson,” he said, alluding to what he described as Iran’s significant scientific and military advances. “This vibrant nation will never be brought to its knees.”

But he acknowledged that Iran had work to do to ensure it could meet the challenge of economic warfare waged against it. He said Iran needed to shake off dependence on oil exports and the government needed to adopt astute economic policies.

The last 12 months have inflicted a heavy financial burden on Iran’s population as sanctions, combined with what critics say is government mismanagement, have torn the economy.

With inflation and unemployment soaring and the value of the Iranian currency halved since a year ago, the vast majority of Iranians have tightened their belts to celebrate Iran’s new year – or Nowruz, the nation’s most important holiday.

Traditional foods and purchasing new clothes – central Nowruz traditions – have become a great deal more expensive.

The government has set up subsidised local markets to try to restrain food prices and warned Of heavy fines for those caught profiteering, but that has not prevented an inflationary spiral.

A kilo of pistachios has more that doubled in recent months, forcing many Iranians to stop buying a traditional Nowruz food.

“How are ordinary people suppose to afford that? What would be next? Probably next year, we can’t even afford simple fruits,” said 48-year-old Shahrokh, who works in a taxi agency.

 

March 21, 2013
Author: Richard Neal
   

As reported in The Jewish Press on March 14, 2013, there is a new call for something previously unthinkable. Sinem Tezyapar, a Muslim TV producer in Turkey, has called for the rebuilding of the “Prophet Solomon’s” Temple.

She assures her fellow Muslims that they need not be nervous because:

“There is a broad expanse of land around the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock. The land there is quite convenient in that respect, and the Temple can be placed just a little way from Qubbat As-Sakhrah, and a little ahead of Masjid el-Aqsa.”

There are overtones of wanting peace and togetherness with the Jewish people in her statements as well. This is a very interesting development and would be easy to dismiss as just one secular Muslim’s simplistic idea. Unfortunately, the fact that she is a woman in the Muslim world makes the idea even less feasible. However, this is not the first time this idea has come from the lips of a Muslim. According to an article in Word Net Daily, an influential Muslim leader by the name of Adnan Oktar in Turkey is described as making the same proposal, to rebuild the Jewish Temple, calling it the “Palace of Solomon.”

The Jewish people have longed for their Temple to be rebuilt. In an article about the rebuilding of the Temple, Hassidic writer and publisher Mordechai Housman, describes the first and primary obstacle as being political, and second being safety reasons due to Muslims. If a significant Muslim leader would declare that Solomon’s Temple should be rebuilt, then if the Muslim community would follow, it is likely the Jewish people would jump at the opportunity and be able to overcome whatever ceremonial obstacles also lie in the path.

This is very significant prophetically, because the Jewish Temple must be standing at the mid-point of the time period commonly known as the Tribulation. The Apostles John and Paul, the Prophet Daniel, and Jesus Himself make references to this Temple standing.

Daniel 9:27a says:

“And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” (KJV)

The “he” spoken of here is the coming world leader, known as the Antichrist. The “one week” is the seven years of the Tribulation period.

In Matthew 24:15–16, Jesus references this very passage:

“When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:” (KJV)

This “Abomination of Desolation” is set up in the Most Holy Place, which is well known to be the Holy of Holies in the Jewish Temple. Thus this Temple must be standing in order for the “Abomination of Desolation” to happen.

Paul writes in 2 Thessalonians 2:3–4:

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.” (KJV)

Here also is a reference to the Antichrist (the man of sin) declaring himself God inside the Temple of God. This also is the Jewish Temple.

In Revelation 11:1–2, John tells us:

“And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.” (KJV)

Forty-two months is also equivalent to half of seven years. In other words, the Temple which John refers to is standing, not only in the middle of the Tribulation, but it has been standing for the entire first part of the Tribulation.

There are several big milestones that students of prophecy are waiting for. One of those is the construction of the Third Jewish Temple for it does indeed seem to be a prerequisite to the beginning of the Tribulation period. If not a prerequisite, then it does definitely need to be standing by the midpoint of the Tribulation. With hints that the Muslim world might be agreeable to its construction, it would seem this particular milestone might be nearer than many think.

March 19, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

 

This, not the Chinese or the Russians represent the greatest threat to the world and might be the fulfillment of the book of Revelation in the Holy Bible.

 

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

 

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

 

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

 

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

 

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

 

Here’s how it works:

 

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

 

United States — Muslim 0.6%

Australia — Muslim 1.5%

Canada — Muslim 1.9%

China — Muslim 1.8%

Italy — Muslim 1.5%

Norway — Muslim 1.8%

 

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

 

Denmark — Muslim 2%

Germany — Muslim 3.7%

United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%

Spain — Muslim 4%

Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

 

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

 

France — Muslim 8%

Philippines — Muslim 5%

Sweden — Muslim 5%

Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%

The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%

Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

 

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.

The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

 

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. . Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

 

Guyana — Muslim 10%

India — Muslim 13.4%

Israel — Muslim 16%

Kenya — Muslim 10%

Russia — Muslim 15%

 

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

 

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

 

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

 

Bosnia — Muslim 40%

Chad — Muslim 53.1%

Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

 

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

 

Albania — Muslim 70%

Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%

Qatar — Muslim 77.5%

Sudan — Muslim 70%

 

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and is on-going in:

 

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%

Egypt — Muslim 90%

Gaza — Muslim 98.7%

Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%

Iran — Muslim 98%

Iraq — Muslim 97%

Jordan — Muslim 92%

Morocco — Muslim 98.7%

Pakistan — Muslim 97%

Palestine — Muslim 99%

Syria — Muslim 90%

Tajikistan — Muslim 90%

Turkey — Muslim 99.8%

United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

 

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

 

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%

Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%

Somalia — Muslim 100%

Yemen — Muslim 100%

 

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

 

‘Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. — Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’

 

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

 

Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population. But their birth rates are higher than the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.

 

Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse.

The wolves will be herding the sheep!

 

NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant…? Just wondering.

 

Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions?

Doesn’t this make you feel safer already??

 

That should make the United States much safer, huh!!

Was it not “Devout Muslim men” that flew planes into U.S. buildings only 10 years ago?

We must never forget this..

Was it not a Devout Muslim man who killed 13 at Fort Hood ? (He killed “From within” -don’t forget that).

 

Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities. Can a good Muslim be a good American? This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

 

Theologically – no . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia

 

Religiously – no. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)

 

Scripturally – no. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

 

Geographically – no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

 

Socially – no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews..

 

Politically – no. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.

 

Domestically – no. Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)

 

Intellectually – no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

 

Philosophically – no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression.. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

 

Spiritually – no. Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran’s 99 excellent names.

 

Therefore, after much study and deliberation. … Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. – - – They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish, it’s still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.

 

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.   Look at the countries around the world where they have already gone “within”.  Be afraid. Be very afraid….

 

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

March 16, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

Archaeologists fear billion-pound development has led to destruction of key historical sites

 

The authorities in Saudi Arabia have begun dismantling some of the oldest sections of Islam’s most important mosque as part of a highly controversial multi-billion expansion.

Photographs obtained by The Independent reveal how workers with drills and mechanical diggers have started demolishing some Ottoman and Abbasid sections on the eastern side of the Masjid al-Haram in Mecca.

The building, which is also known as the Grand Mosque, is the holiest site in Islam because it contains the Kaaba –  the point to which all Muslims face when praying. The columns are the last remaining sections of the mosque which date back more than a few hundred years and form the inner perimeter on the outskirts of the white marble floor surrounding the Kaaba.

The new photos, taken over the last few weeks, have caused alarm among archaeologists and come as Prince Charles – a long term supporter of preserving architectural heritage – flew into Saudi Arabia yesterday for a visit with the Duchess of Cornwall. The timing of his tour has been criticised by human rights campaigners after the Saudis shot seven men in public earlier this week despite major concerns about their trial and the fact that some of the men were juveniles at the time of their alleged crimes.

Many of the Ottoman and Abbasid columns in Mecca were inscribed with intricate Arabic calligraphy marking the names of the Prophet Muhammad’s companions and key moments in the founder of Islam’s life. One column which is believed to have been ripped down is supposed to mark the sport where Muslims believe Muhammad began his heavenly journey on a winged horse which took him to Jerusalem and heaven in a single night.

To accommodate the ever increasing number of pilgrims heading to the twin holy cities of Mecca and Medina each year the Saudi authorities have embarked upon a massive expansion project. Billions of pounds have been poured in to increase the capacity of the Masjid al-Haram and the Masjid an-Nabawi in Medina which marks where Muhammad is buried. King Abdullah has put the prominent Wahabi cleric and imam of the Grand Mosque, Abdul Rahman al-Sudais, in charge of the expansion while the Saudi Binladin Group – the country’s largest firms – has won the construction contract.

While there is little disagreement over the need to expand, critics have accused the Saudi regime of wantonly disregarding the archaeological, historical and cultural heritage of Islam’s two holiest cities. In the last decade Mecca has been transformed from a dusty desert pilgrimage town into a gleaming metropolis of sky scrapers that tower of the Masjid al-Haram and are filled with a myriad of shopping malls, luxury apartments and five star hotels.

But such a transformation has come at a cost. The Washington-based Gulf Institute estimates that 95 per cent of Mecca’s millennium-old buildings have been demolished in the past two decades alone. Dozens of key historical sites dating back to the birth of Islam have already been lost and there is a scramble among archaeologists and academics to try and encourage the authorities to preserve what little remains.

Many senior Wahabis are vehemently against the preservation of historical Islamic sites that are linked to the profit because they believe it encourages shirq – the sin of idol worshipping.

But Dr Irfan al-Alawi, executive director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation which obtained the new photographs from inside the Grand Mosque, says the removal of the Ottoman and Abbasid columns will leave future generations of Muslims ignorant of their significance.

“It matters because many of these columns signified certain areas of the mosque where the Prophet sat and prayed,” he said. “The historical record is being deleted. A new Muslim would never have a clue because there’s nothing marking these locations now. There are ways you could expand Mecca and Medina while protecting the historical heritage of the mosque itself and the surrounding sites.”

There are signs that King Abdullah has listened to concerns about the historical destruction of Mecca and Medina. Last October The Independent revealed how new plans for the masjid an-Nabawi in Medina would  result in the destruction of three of the world’s oldest mosques on the west hand side of the main complex. However new plans approved by King Abdullah last week appear to show a change of heart with the bulk of the expansion now slated to take place to the north of the Masjid an-Nabawi.

However key sites are still at risk. The Independent has obtained a presentation used by the Saudis to illustrate how the expansion of Mecca’s main mosque will look. In one of the slides it is clear that the Bayt al-Mawlid, an area which is believed to be the house where Muhammad was born it, will have to be removed unless plans change.

The Independent asked the Saudi Embassy in London a number of questions about the expansion plans and why more was not being done to preserve key historical sites. They replied: “Thank you for calling, but no comment.”

 

March 11, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

 

Sayyid SyeedDr. Benjamin Carson captivated the media’s attention with his speech at the National Prayer Breakfast, but another attendee deserved some of the spotlight: Sayyid Syeed, the interfaith liaison for the Islamic Society of North America, who was recorded in 2006 saying, “[O]ur job is to change the Constitution of America.”

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) originates in the Muslim Brotherhood, but has been embraced on a bi-partisan basis. FBI sources reporting back to the mid-1980s identified it as a Brotherhood front. In 2007, the U.S. government designated ISNA an unindicted co-conspirator in the terrorism-financing trial of the Holy Land Foundation, listing it as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity.

A 1991 Brotherhood memo, which describes its “work in America as a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within,” likewise mentions ISNA and several of its components as its fronts. In 2009, a federal judgeupheld ISNA’s designation as an unindicted co-conspirator because of “ample” evidence linking it to Hamas.

The work of ISNA and its allies in forging interfaith partnerships is undoubtedly a fulfillment of this directive. ISNA has used these interfaith relationships to slam its critics as “Islamophobes,” as it did at an event on January 15 at the First Congregational United Church of Christ in Washington, D.C.

Sayyid Syeed, ISNA’s Secretary-General from 1994 to 2006, is now the Director of ISNA’s Office of Interfaith and Community Alliances. New footage has been released of him stating in 2006, “[O]ur job is to the change the Constitution of America,” as seen in the film, The Grand Deception.

Syeed and ISNA were invited to the National Prayer Breakfast at which President Obama spoke. Syeed also addressed about 100 evangelical leaders during the Middle East/North Africa Prayer Breakfast. Dr. Mohamed Elsanousi, ISNA’s Director of Community Outreach, also spoke.

The National Prayer Breakfast was organized by the Fellowship Foundation and hosted by co-chairs Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR) and Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL). Other speakers included Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Rep. Janice Hahn (D-CA) and, ironically, Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-TX), one of the brave congressmen who wrote letters asking for investigations into the relationships between ISNA and other Brotherhood legacy groups and the U.S. government.

Shortly after the National Prayer Breakfast, Syeed was the keynote speaker at the annual legislative conference of the Joint Religious Legislative Coalition in St. Paul, Minnesota. It was attended by over 700 faith community leaders, and the Coalition includes the Minnesota Council of Churches, Minnesota Catholic Conferences, Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Islamic Center of Minnesota. He also spoke at the University of St. Thomas’s Muslim Christian Dialogue Center.

Syeed’s preaching is echoed by Muzammil Siddiqi, a member at large of ISNA’s board of directors. He was also the president from 1997 to 2000. He has spoken in support of the long-term implementation of Sharia Law and said in 2001 that Muslims “should participate in the [democratic] system to safeguard our interest and try to bring gradual change for the right cause, the cause of truth and justice. We must not forget that Allah’s rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that direction.”

The rhetoric of both ISNA officials is in line with the Muslim Brotherhood’s doctrine of gradualism, a phased approach towards implementing Sharia-based governance. Contrary to the Al-Qaeda-type Islamists, Brotherhood Islamists encourage involvement in secular democratic governments if necessary.

Terms made popular by these governments are even reinterpreted through Islamist lenses. Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yousef al-Qaradawi preaches, “What I am for is a genuine type of democracy, for a society driven by the laws of Sharia that is compatible with the values of freedom, human rights, justice and equity.”

The Islamist orientation of ISNA is also apparent in the guest speakers it has and the causes it chooses to, or chooses not to, champion. Last year, Tunisian Islamist Rachid Ghannouchi was booked to speak at its annual convention. Last month, ISNA hosted Somalia’s Muslim Brotherhood-linked President.

On the other hand, secular democratic activists opposed to the Muslim Brotherhood are never given a platform. ISNA is silent when crowds of Egyptians protest the Muslim Brotherhood. ISNA says not a word when tens of thousands of Muslims stand against Islamists in Bangladesh in what has been called “the first time ever in the Muslim world there has been a popular uprising against the fascism of Islamist parties.”

ISNA’s presence at the National Prayer Breakfast is exactly what the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood envisioned when it told its network to master “the art of ‘coalitions.’”

 

February 22, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

King Hamad al-KhalifahThe Wall Street Journal reports that there is now a power struggle within the Bahraini royal family, with pro-U.S. King Hamad al-Khalifah losing power to the Islamist Khawalid faction. The Khawalids control the royal court, judiciary, security services and military.

Their influence threatens to bring Bahrain into the Muslim Brotherhood camp. On the other hand, about 60-70% of the population is Shiite, raising fears that a democratic process could move Bahrain towards Iran.

The answer may lie in a political alliance between the moderate elements of the Bahraini royal family and the moderate Shiite opposition. The Al-Wefaq Party, the largest opposition party, condemned Iranian interference, as did the Democratic Alliance, a bloc of three parties. A spokesman for the leader of the Al-Wefaq Party even said, “Let the Palestinians solve their own problems” when asked about the conflict.

Jordanian King Abdullah II has had some success in outmaneuvering the Islamists by reaching out to the more liberal and secular opposition elements. This will be more difficult for King al-Khalifah to accomplish because of the sectarian divide, the power of the Khawalids within his own family and bad blood from his government’s violent suppression.

If the Khawalids’ control continues to grow, they may actually be able to enact policy unilaterally through the institutions they dominate. The king could be forced to do their bidding, relegated to a mere figurehead.  The only way al-Khalifah can counter this is by shifting his power base. If he can embrace the moderate Shiite opposition, he may able to stand up to the Sunni Islamists and isolate the Shiite Islamists.

It is a strategic imperative that the alignment of Bahrain with the West be preserved. If the Khawalids bring the country into the Muslim Brotherhood bloc, the rest of the Sunni Gulf may follow suit. If a sectarian conflict ensues, a civil war could ignite that expands Iran’s influence.

The answer isn’t based in playing one sect off another. The answer lies in uniting the non-Islamists by convincing them that the ideological struggle is more important than the sectarian one.

 

 

 

 

January 31, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

Bible prophecy – or Eschatology – is unique in all the worlds’ literature because it is – literally – history written in advance. And one can look back over the centuries to learn just how accurate the Bible has been in predicting detailed events hundres, even thousands of years in advance. For example, the Apostle Paul, while speaking of end time events, somewhere around 48/49 A.D., writes: “Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ….Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way for that day [the day of His appearing] will not come until the rebellion occurs [the great apostasy] and the man of lawlessness [the Antichrist] is revealed….” (2nd Thess 2:1-3 see also Matt 24:10-12; 1st Tim 4:1; Rev 13:5-6).

With the above being true, I thought a recent study by the California-based Barna Group was very revealing regarding Americans support for the Bible.  With the nation facing drastic financial and social challenges in recent years, this new study ranking American support for the Holy Bible reveals an astounding 91 out 96 U.S. cities – a whopping 95 percent – are not “Bible-minded.”

The study by the California-based Barna Group on behalf of the American Bible Society is based on 42,855 nationwide interviews, and defines “Bible-minded” people as individuals who typically read the Bible each week and who strongly assert Scripture is accurate in the principles it teaches. Authors of the report say the definition captures action and attitude – those who both engage and esteem the Christian Scriptures, reflecting an overall openness or resistance to the Bible in the country’s largest markets. “The overall picture that is painted depends on one’s vantage point,” said David Kinnaman, president of Barna Group. “The least sanguine way to analyze the results would be to emphasize the lack of Bible-mindedness in America. In 91 out of 96 markets, a majority of the residents are not Bible-minded.”

But for those who prefer to look on the bright side, Kinnaman explains, “A more optimistic way to view those markets would be to look at those cities with at least one-fifth Bible-mindedness – meaning those areas where at least one out of five adults are open to engaging and esteeming the Bible.” He continued: “Among some researchers, this proportion – 20 percent – is often thought to be something of a social or technological “tipping point” (for example, once one in five people had mobile phones, the momentum toward more people owning mobile phones began to grow exponentially). In this analysis, 83 out of 96 cities in the U.S. have at least 20 percent of their residents qualifying as Bible-minded. Christian leaders should recognize that most of the major cities in the nation continue to have basis for biblical engagement among a significant share of the population.”

The study ranks the top markets for Bible-mindedness, and not surprisingly, the South, known for years as the Bible belt, is at the top of the list. Knoxville, Tenn., Shreveport, La. and Chattanooga, Tenn., all have 52 percent of their respective populations being Bible-minded. They’re followed by Birmingham, Ala. (50 percent), Jackson, Miss. (50 percent), Springfield, Mo. (49 percent), Charlotte, N.C. (48 percent), Lynchburg, Va. (48 percent), Huntsville-Decatur, Ala. (48 percent) and Charleston, W.V. (47 percent).

The least Bible-oriented markets tend to be from the Northeast, especially the New England area. The lowest score came from Providence, R.I. at just 9 percent. Ironically, the city’s name actually refers to God’s divine providence. Albany, N.Y., is next from the bottom at 10 percent. Putting this in perspective, the most Bible-minded markets are five times more likely to have residents who qualify as Bible-minded than is true in these two Northeastern cities. Though these two cities are the most extreme, none of the cities in the bottom 10 break 20 percent, where even one in five people could be considered Bible-minded.

The New England area is home to most of the markets in the bottom 10, including Burlington, Vt. (16 percent), Portland, Maine (16 percent), Hartford, Conn. (16 percent), Boston, Mass. (16 percent), Buffalo, N.Y. (18 percent) and New York City (18 percent). The remaining markets in the bottom 10 are primarily in the West and include San Francisco (16 percent), Phoenix, Ariz., (17 percent), and Las Vegas (18 percent).

The study found some notable patterns.

  • Among the nation’s largest 30 cities, 10 of them are in the top half of the Bible-minded market rankings, while 20 of them are in the bottom half. Generally speaking, the more densely populated areas tend to be less Bible-oriented.
  • Among the largest markets there are many more relatively Bible-minded cities, including Dallas / Fort Worth (27th), Atlanta (28th), Indianapolis (32nd), Houston (39th), St. Louis (41st), Cleveland (43rd) and Detroit (46th).
  • Philadelphia (28 percent, rank: 52) is among the most Bible-minded cities along the eastern seaboard, ranking slightly higher than the aforementioned Northeastern cities as well as Washington, D.C. (25 percent, rank: 63) and Baltimore (26 percent, rank: 60).
  • Chicago is the nation’s third largest city, and while it tends to be a bastion of many evangelical organizations, ranks between New York and Los Angeles in terms of Bible-mindedness (23 percent, rank: 76th). Colorado Springs, Colo., which is also home to many Christian organizations, is right in the middle of the pack (29 percent, rank: 51st). By comparison, Denver is ranked lower (71st) with about one in four individual’s qualifying as Bible-minded (24 percent).
  • In the Northwest portion of the country, the cities are all fairly similar, with about a quarter of the population being Bible-minded, including most notably Portland OR (25 percent, rank: 65th and Seattle, WA (24 percent, rank: 69th).
  • In Florida: Though in the South, most of the major cities on the peninsula rank near the bottom middle of Bible-minded cities, including West Palm Beach (28 percent, ranked 53rd out of 96 markets), Tampa-St. Petersburg (27 percent, rank: 57), Orlando (25 percent, rank: 64), and Miami (24 percent, rank: 70). The exceptions to these patterns are in the northern part of the state, including Pensacola / Mobile (45 percent, rank: 13) and Jacksonville (41 percent, rank: 20). These two cities are more on trend with other Southern states and likely reflect more of a native Floridian or Southern population and fewer transplants than the Southern Florida cities.
  • In California: In addition to San Francisco being among the lowest rated, most of the major California cities are in the bottom third of the rankings. The Los Angeles media market represents a pretty normal range for California cities with 24 percent of the residents being Bible-minded (ranking 68th out of 96 cities,). San Diego (24 percent, rank: 74), Sacramento (24 percent, rank: 72), and Fresno / Visalia (25 percent, rank: 66) were also bunched in the same range. Bakersfield, CA stood out as being among the most Bible-minded cities in the Pacific states (39 percent, rank: 26).
  • In Texas: As part of the traditional “Bible belt,” Texas stayed fairly true to trend, with most of it’s major cities ranking in the top half of Bible-minded cities. Dallas / Fort Worth ranked as the top Bible-minded city in Texas (38 percent Bible-minded, ranking at 27th) over San Antonio (36 percent, rank: 33), Houston (32 percent, rank: 39) and Austin (29 percent, rank: 48). Notable exceptions to the Bible-mindedness of Texas cities were Harlingen / Weslaco / McAllen / Brownsville (28 percent, rank: 56), Waco (27 percent, rank: 59), and most significantly El Paso (23 percent, rank: 80). These exceptions are likely a result of these markets having a higher percentage of Hispanic Catholics, who are less likely to engage the Bible.

The Barna Group study is already getting varied reaction online.

“I think that it is interesting that you used the term ‘Bible-minded’ as opposed to Christian. I’m assuming that is because you, like me, acknowledge that those are two different things. ‘Bible-minded’ areas have more assault rifles, more venereal disease, fewer college graduates, more poverty, and if it were not for the Civil War would probably still have slaves, had to have integration forced upon them. In short, some of the most ‘Bible-minded’ states (like Mississippi) are the least Christian,” said Keith Johnston.

But Robert Netterville responded, “Having grown up in the Deep South (Mississippi to be exact), I will simply say that Christianity is a cultural phenomenon. It is one thing to hold a mental high regard for the sacred but another to live it out. As a Baptist pastor in the South, I will acknowledge that many people have a shallow affinity for the Bible but have not had a life-changing experience (born again) with Jesus Christ. The South is going the way of the North as we continue to slip into a godless country. There was a day when the northern brethren of the faith believed the Bible, too. Gone are the days of ‘In God We Trust.’”

 

January 25, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

Strangely the terrorist attack on our Consulate at Benghazi has gone almost unreported by the liberal-media in America with the exception of Fox News. And the Obama Administration has stumbled all over itself in its obvious lies and cover-ups regarding the events in Benghazi. Why? Why is the President and his Administration going to such lengths to cover up the Benghazi debacle; and why is the liberal-media seemingly so complacent over this obvious cover-up on the part of the Administration? Senator Rand Paul (R) Ky may have let the cat out of the bag during yesterdays Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee hearings on Benghazi.

During the Senate hearing on Benghazi yesterday, outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed she did not know whether the U.S. special mission attacked on Sept. 11 was involved in gun-running. The remarks were perhaps the most important and telling of the entire hearing since they address a possible motive behind the jihadist attacks.

The exchange on the subject took place with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya? “To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.” Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know is the annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons, and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?” Clinton replied, “Well, senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.” “You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul. “I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

That section of the exchange with Paul was almost entirely ignored by media, which instead focused on the Republican senator’s earlier statement that if he were president he would have relieved Clinton of her post. Various news agencies have filed numerous reports quoting Middle East security officials who describe the mission in Benghazi as a meeting place to coordinate aid for the rebel-led insurgencies in the Middle East. In September, a story broke claiming that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian security officials.

In November, Middle Eastern security sources further described both the U.S. mission and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi as the main intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels that was being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Among the tasks performed inside the building was collaborating with countries, most notably Turkey, on the recruitment of fighters – including jihadists – to target Assad’s regime, the security officials said.

According to the 39-page report released last month by independent investigators probing the attacks at the diplomatic facility, the U.S. mission in Benghazi was set up without the knowledge of the new Libyan government. “Another key driver behind the weak security platform in Benghazi was the decision to treat Benghazi as a temporary, residential facility, not officially notified to the host government, even though it was also a full-time office facility,” the report states. “This resulted in the Special Mission compound being excepted from office facility standards and accountability under the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (SECCA) and the Overseas Security Policy Board (OSPB).” The report, based on a probe led by former U.S. diplomat Thomas Pickering, calls the facility a “Special U.S. Mission.”

During the Libyan revolution against Moammar Gadhafi’s regime, the U.S. admitted to directly arming the rebel groups. At the time, rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi acknowledged in an interview that a significant number of the Libyan rebels were al-Qaida fighters, many of whom had fought U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. He insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,” but he added that the “members of al-Qaida are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader.”

Media cover up?

From the beginning, U.S. media reports on the events in Benghazi have been misleading. The vast majority of media coverage worldwide refers to the U.S. facility that was attacked as a “consulate,” even though the government itself has been careful to call it a “mission.” A consulate typically refers to the building that houses a consul, who is the official representative of the government of one state in the territory of another. The U.S. consul in Libya, Jenny Cordell, works out of the embassy in Tripoli. Consulates at times function as junior embassies, providing services related to visas, passports and citizen information. On Aug. 26, about two weeks before his was killed, Ambassador Stevens attended a ceremony marking the opening of consular services at the Tripoli embassy. The main role of a consulate is to foster trade with the host and care for its own citizens who are traveling or living in the host nation.

Diplomatic missions, on the other hand, maintain a more generalized role. A diplomatic mission is simply a group of people from one state or an international inter-governmental organization present in another state to represent matters of the sending state or organization in the receiving state. However, according to the State Department investigation, the building was a “U.S. Special Mission” set up without the knowledge of the Libyan government.

Withholding, misleading

Two days before the November presidential election, CBS posted additional portions of a Sept. 12 “60 Minutes” interview in which Obama made statements that contradicted his earlier claims about the attack. In the released portions of the interview, Obama would not say whether he thought the attack was terrorism. Yet he would later emphasize at a presidential debate that in the Rose Garden on the day of the attack, he had declared it an act of terror. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Reuters quoted a purported civilian protester by his first name who described a supposedly popular demonstration against an anti-Muhammad film outside the U.S. building.

Immediately following the attack, President Obama and other White House officials claimed anti-American sentiment fueled by the obscure anti-Muhammad video on YouTube sparked civilian protests outside the U.S. mission that devolved into a jihadist onslaught. However, vivid accounts provided by the State Department and intelligence officials later made clear no such popular demonstration took place. Instead, video footage from Benghazi reportedly shows an organized group of armed men attacking the compound, officials said.

So the question now – among others – should be is the Obama Administration arming Turkey and various jihadist groups in an attempt to bring the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Syria? And were they doing so out of the “Special Mission” in Libya? And where are the weapons that reportedly were being stored at Benghazi now? Are they being used by the jihadists in Mali?

I’ve written many articles on this blog arguing that Turkey is the ancient land of Gog and Magog. Just as I have written many articles arguing the possibility that the Syrian civil war could break out beyond Syrian borders and, with Turkey playing such a key role in the Syrian conflict, we could very well be looking at the earliest stages of The War of Gog and Magog (Eze 38, 39).

If, in fact, Benghazi was nothing more than a shipping center for the Obama Administration running weapons and jihadists into Turkey and Syria, as Senator Paul claimed, then the civil war in Syria is much bigger and takes on even more significance than I originally thought. And now, with the jihadists turning on their masters in Benghazi, and stealing whatever weapons were at Benghazi, then we can expect that those weapons have made their way into Mali and other Northern African countries and that, as a result, the violence there should only escalate?

The pro-Islamic policies of the Obama Administration, specially their pro-Muslim Brotherhood policies, have already rewritten the map in the Middle East with the fall of the pro-Western Mubarak regime in Egypt, the fall of Gaddafi in Libya, the change of governments in Yemen and Algeria combined with the Muslim Brotherhood filling the political vacuums left behind in these various countries. Now, with the help and support of the Obama Administration, it appears as if Syria is next in line.

Many have asked me over the years how an Islamic coalition force could – as the War of Gog and Magog suggests – invade the modern state of Israel when it was so obvious that America would never allow that to happen. My answer has always been the same; ‘Something has to change in America; Either through war or economic collapse, or through a drastic change in our foreign policy.’ What we are seeing today is an answer to that question which is a drastic shift in America’s foreign policy under the pro-Islamic Obama Administration.

The Obama Administration obviously does not understand the spiritual forces they are dealing with. Eschatology, or end time prophecy is clear in that The War of Gog and Magog is near – and the Obama Administration is playing right into the hands of bible prophecy

January 4, 2013
Author: Richard Neal

Many have asked – and continue to ask me ‘Where, given America’s Super Power status, can America be found in end time prophecy?’  My answer is usually the same: ‘Eschatology, or bible prophecy is only concerned with the Jewsh state of Israel and the Church. Any mention of people, nations of empires are only made as these people, nations or empires interchange with Israel and/or the Church. Thus, one should not look for – or expect – any mention of American in end time prophecy unless America plays some kind of role with either Israel and/or the Church, and that role is of such significance as to warrant any mention. Even then one should expect little more than an inference of America’s role rather than an outright naming of America.

Nevertheless, given America’s Super Power status, it is a fair and logical question to ask, especially when one takes into account America’s foreign policy since the end of World-War II, specifically its commitment to Israel since 1948.  In other words, how could any nation or coalition of nations ever invade the modern state of Israel, even if they were led by the Antichrist, without America getting heavenly envolved? Since I am not a prophet, I don’t pretend to have a clear answer to this question. Still, during the research and writing of my new book, Kingdom of the Antichrist, I, by necessity, gave this question a great deal of thought. The answer, for me, became obvious. Because I believe – and teach – that the War of Gog and MaGog is the end time event that will result in Israel entering into a peace treaty with the Antichrist – thus initiating Daniel’s 70th Week and the prophetic time clock ticking down the last seven years of this generation, America’s super power status and/or its attitude towards Israel must change. In other words, because I believe – and teach – that the ten nation coalition force that Ezekiel tells us will invade Israel (Eze 38, 39) is the same end time character as Daniel’s fourth empire or “The Kingdom of the Antichrist,” and that this empire is, indeed, the Islamic Empire, something, then, with America and/or with America’s foreign policy much change which emboldens these Islamic nations into believing that any invasion of Israel will not be met by American military agression.

Consequently, one could argue that an economic disaster in America would preclude it from defending Israel’s sovereignty; maybe America is attacked militarily at the same time, and this attack precludes America from defending Israel? One could come up with many more speculative scenarios, but they would be nothing more than just that – speculative scenarios because Scripture does not mention America by name.

Nevertheless, I have always believed and taught that, in my opinion, and this is nothing more than speculation on my part, for whatever reason or reasons, America would end up changing its foreign policy towards Israel. And that this change in foreign policy would be detrimental towards Israel while being pro-Islamic. I’ve been teaching this belief for years and, prior to Barak Obama being elected President, I have to admit that my “opinion” didn’t look very promising. But, since the very beginning of Barak Obama’s Presidency, he and his administration have, behind the scenes, completely changed America’s traditional support for Israel and, even taken it a step further by embracing various Islamic nations and organisations, i.e. The Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, it is my belief that the Obama Administration, led by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, were instrumental in the “Arab Spring” events which have changed the geo-political landscape in North Africa and the Middle East to the degree we see it today. History, I believe, will prove me right by showing the Obama Administration’s involvement in the Arab Spring movement to such a degree that I believe the whole Arab Spring movement was orchestrated by the C.I.A under orders from the Obama Administration.

Consequently, one can understand how interested I was when I came across an Egyptian magazine article recently effectively affirming not only my concerns, but also the concerns of five much-maligned Republican House members and the evidence presented in an investigative book, all of who claim six American Muslim leaders who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have significant influence on U.S. policy.

Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine, in a Dec. 22 story, said the six men turned the White House “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.”The Egyptian article was translated and reported by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, or IPT. IPT said that while the story is largely unsourced, it is significant because it raises the issue to Egyptian readers.

The article names Arif Alikhan, assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference; Salam al-Marayati, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, or MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA; and Eboo Patel, a member of President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.

Meanwhile, outspoken Republican congressman Louie Gohmert has been pressing for an investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence on the federal government, contending a probe is necessary because of the Obama administration’s “horrendous decisions” in backing the so-called “Arab Spring” revolutions in the Middle East. The East Texas lawmaker was one of five Republican Congress members who stirred bipartisan controversy in June by raising concern about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the nation’s capital.

The Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood was formed in the 1920s after the demise of the Ottoman Turkish empire with the intent of helping establish Islamic rule worldwide. It’s stated goal for the U.S. is “a kind of grand jihad” aimed at “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within” so that “Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

In 2009, the  bestselling book “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret World That’s Conspiring to Islamize America” featured an internal Council on American-Islamic Relations memo written in 2007 that called for infiltrating the “judiciary, intelligence and homeland security committees” by, among other things, “placing Muslim interns” in Capitol Hill offices. The book also uncovered new evidence that CAIR directly funded Hamas and al-Qaida terrorist fronts.

When the book was released, Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., co-founder of the bipartisan House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus and a member of the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence, pointed out at a press conference in Washington that groups such as CAIR and the Islamic Society of North America “have a proven record of senior officials being indicted and either imprisoned or deported from the United States.” She noted evidence presented at the trial of the Texas-based Muslim charity Holy Land Foundation, convicted of funding Hamas, exposed CAIR, ISNA and others as front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States. Moreover, Myrick exposed the absence of a formal vetting process by Congress for screening radical Muslims invited to work or pray or speak at the Capitol. CAIR, consequently, placed a number of employees within the Capitol, including known terrorists and terrorist suspects. CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, for example, invited al-Qaida terrorist Anwar Awlaki to speak and pray at the Capitol. Awad also helped get Awlaki into the Pentagon within months of Awlaki assisting the 9/11 hijackers, Catherine Herridge revealed in her book “The Next Wave.”

Direct link

The Egyptian magazine noted Alikhan is a founder of the World Islamic Organization, identifying it as a Brotherhood “subsidiary,” IPT reported. Alikhan was responsible for the “file of Islamic states” in the White House and provides the direct link between the Obama administration and the Arab Spring revolutions of 2011, according to the magazine.

Elibiary, as reported in October 2011, was singled out by Gohmert at a House hearing. The Republican congressman confronted Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano with a charge that Elibiary, who had a security clearance as a member of the DHS advisory council, accessed a federal database and shopped sensitive reports to a left-leaning media outlet to publicize his claim that the department is promoting “Islamophobia.” Elibiary, president and CEO of the Freedom and Justice Foundation of Carrollton, Texas, has been a strong supporter of the radical Islamic theologian Sayyid Qutb, whose teachings inspired and continue to govern al-Qaida and Islamic jihadist organizations worldwide.

Former assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy documents that the DHS advisory group helped devise the new Obama counterterrorism strategy. McCarthy, who prosecuted the perpetrators of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, said the strategy “has law-enforcement pare back their intelligence-gathering activities and take their marching orders from ‘community partners.’”

It was reported in 2004 that Elibiary spoke at a conference that honored the founder of the Iranian Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini. Elibiary has strongly criticized the U.S. government’s prosecution of fundraisers for Hamas and is a defender of CAIR. He has also criticized the U.S. government’s prosecution and conviction of the Holy Land Foundation and five former officials for providing more than $12 million to Hamas, characterizing the case as a defeat for the United States.

The Egyptian magazine, Rose El-Youssef, said Rashad Hussain maintained close ties with people and groups in the Muslim Brotherhood network in America. He took part, the magazine noted, in the June 2002 annual conference of the American Muslim Council, formerly headed by convicted terrorist financier Abdurahman Alamoudi. He also was on the organizing committee of the Critical Islamic Reflection along with key Brotherhood figures such as Jamal Barzinji, Hisham al-Talib and Yaqub Mirza. MPAC’s al-Marayati has been among the most influential Muslim American leaders in recent years, IPT pointed out. The Egyptian magazine shows the links between MPAC and the international Muslim Brotherhood infrastructure.

Obama appointed Magid, chief of the Muslim Brotherhood-founded ISNA, as an adviser to the Department of Homeland Security. Magid also has also given speeches and conferences on American Middle East policy at the State Department and offered advice to the FBI, the Egyptian magazine said.

Patel maintains a close relationship with Tariq Ramadan, the grandson of Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan al-Banna, Rose El-Youssef reported. He’s a member of the Muslim Students Association, which was identified as a Muslim Brotherhood front group in a 1991 document introduced into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation trial.

Investigation warranted

In July, Gohmert, along with Rep. Michele Bachmann, R, Minn., and three other Republican House members, pointed to Hillary Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, as a possible Muslim Brotherhood influence on U.S. policy. The lawmakers asked the inspector generals at the departments of Homeland Security, Justice and State to investigate, prompting Democrats and Republicans to rush to Abedin’s defense.

However, as reported by many, Abedin worked for an organization founded by her family that is effectively at the forefront of a grand Saudi plan to mobilize U.S. Muslim minorities to transform America into a strict Wahhabi-style Islamic state, according to an Arabic-language manifesto issued by the Saudi monarchy. Abedin also was a member of the executive board of the Brotherhood’s Muslim Student Association.

The internal memo said Muslim Brotherhood members “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and by the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Gohmert and other advocates for an investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence on the U.S. government argue a simple reading of security clearance guidelines in reference to Huma Abedin’s family would warrant investigation. The Center for Security Policy notes that security clearance guidelines for federal employees state a “security risk may exist when an individual’s immediate family, including cohabitants and other persons to whom he or she may be bound by affection, influence, or obligation are not citizens of the United States or may be subject to duress.” The guidelines express concern for any “association or sympathy with persons or organizations that advocate the overthrow of the United States Government, or any state or subdivision, by force or violence or by other unconstitutional means.”

Nevertheless, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank has suggested researchers and lawmakers who have presented evidence of the Muslim Brotherhood ties of Abedin and her family are motivated by racism. He commented in a column that it’s “hard to escape the suspicion” that the charges have “something to do with the way she looks and how she worships.”

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the request for an investigation of Abedin and her family a “sinister” and “nothing less than an unwarranted and unfounded attack on an honorable woman, a dedicated American and a loyal public servant.”

 

January 3, 2013
Author: Richard Neal



To no one’s surprise, the Religion of Peace racked up 11,267
dead bodies in 2,459 barbaric terror attacks during 2012.
The Nigerian child pictured above was in the wrong
place at the wrong time… church on a Sunday morning.

Author: Richard Neal
  • Bible prophecy, or in this instance end time prophecy or eschatology is unique in all the words literature in how, not only does it accurately foretell furture events, but it alwasy does so in detail. Some of these details cause many liberal theologians and secular scholars to stumble at times with their interpretations because they refuse to believe the clear teachings contained in bible prophecy. One such end time prophecy is a perfect example of this: “I saw thrones on which had been seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands” (Revelation 20:4). Theologians – both liberal and secular – agree that these souls who had been “beheaded” were slain during The Great Tribulation Period (Matt 2524:21). The problem, at least since the late 18th and early 19th centuries has been, for liberal and secular theologians, that, because no major nation or empire continued to “behead” people, that this verse must be interpreted figuratively.
  • However, they failed to consider the Islamic Empire because they knew little to nothing about its teachings and traditions. Had they considered the Islamic Empire as being the fourth empire of Daniel 7, or known how “beheadings” were Muhammad’s favorite form of punishment for his enemies,  or how he instructed all muslims – through both the Koran and the Hadith (Traditions) to “behead” their enemies, maybe they wouldn’t have dismissed bible prophecy quite so easily?
  • Recently Syrian rebels beheaded a Christian man and fed his body to dogs, according to a nun who says the West is ignoring atrocities committed by Islamic extremists in Syria.The same Syrian extremists the Obama Administration is helping to fund in their civil war with the Assad regime of Syria.
  • The nun said taxi driver Andrei Arbashe, 38, was kidnapped after his brother was heard complaining that fighters against the ruling regime behaved like bandits.She said his headless corpse was found by the side of the road, surrounded by hungry dogs. He had recently married and was soon to be a father.
Volatile fighting: The news of the kidnapping and beheading of Mr Arbashe came as pro-government forces celebrated their victory against rebels at the Air Defence Base in Tal Hassil near from Aleppo Airport last night

Sister Agnes-Mariam de la Croix said: ‘His only crime was his brother criticised the rebels, accused them of acting like bandits, which is what they are.’ There have been a growing number of accounts of atrocities carried out by rogue elements of the Syrian Free Army, which opposes dictator Bashar al-Assad and is recognised by Britain and the West as the legitimate leadership.

Sister Agnes-Miriam, mother superior of the Monastery of St James the Mutilated, has condemned Britain and the Obama Administration for supporting the rebels despite growing evidence of human rights abuses. Murder, kidnapping, rape and robbery are becoming commonplace, she says.

‘The free and democratic world is supporting extremists,’ Sister Agnes-Miriam said from her sanctuary in Lebanon. ‘They want to impose Sharia Law and create an Islamic state in Syria.’

Fatal opinion: The man's brother had criticised the behaviour of members of the Free Syrian Army, seen here during heavy clashes with government forces north of Aleppo earlier this monthThe 60-year-old Carmelite nun claims the west has turned a blind eye to growing evidence of a ‘fifth column’ of fanatics within the rag-tag ranks that make up the Free Syrian Army that they back to oust Assad. One of the most effective fighting forces is the Jabat Al-Nusra, which has an ideology similar to Al Qaeda. ‘The uprising has been hijacked by Islamist mercenaries who are more interested in fighting a holy war than in changing the government,’ she said. ‘It has turned into a sectarian conflict. One in which Christians are paying a high price.’

The rebels attacked the northern town of Ras Al-Ayn, on the Turkish border, last month. The fighters entered the Christian quarter, ordering civilians to leave their homes. ‘More than 200 families were driven out in the night,’ Sister Agnes-Miriam says. ‘People are afraid. Everywhere the deaths squads stop civilians, abduct them and ask for ransom, sometimes they kill them.’

Threat: Sister Agnes-Mariam said that rebel fighters, pictured, are targeting Christians in Syria in a bid to make it a Muslim stateMilitants wearing black bandanas of Al Qaeda recently laid siege to the Monastery of St James the Mutilated, located between Damascus and Homs, for two days in an attempt to prevent Christmas celebrations, the nun claims. An estimated 300,000 Christians have been displaced in the conflict, with 80,000 forced out of the Homs region alone, she claims. Many have fled abroad raising fears that Syria’s Christian community may vanish – like others across Middle East, the birthplace of Christianity.

Al Assad, a member of the Alawite Muslim sect, claims only his regime can protect Syria’s minorities from domination from the Sunni Muslims majority. Meanwhile the fighting continues to rage with government forces retaking control of a key district in the city of Homs yesterday.

The latest violence comes after United Nations peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi warned of ‘hell’ for Syria if no political solution could be found. Russia has stated the conflict is becoming increasingly militarized and sectarian and risks bringing chaos to the whole region.

Some 44,000 people have been killed since the uprising against the Al Assad regime began in March 2011.

End time prophecy is not a pretty thing. It will be a time of “great tribulation” unlike any time prior to it in the history of mankind. That we see Daniel’s fourth beast or empire rising in our nightly news – and the inhumane atrocities they are committing on their own people and others on a daily basis should come as no surprise for those of us who have a correct understanding of eschatological events and characters. Sadly, it will only get worse as The Kingdom of the Antichrist will continue to come together and grow in strength.

 

December 11, 2012
Author: Richard Neal

Eschatology, or end time prophecy is not a pretty thing to understand, nor will it be a pretty thing to witness. Because of that fact[s] I try to stay away from the gruesomeness and ugliness that the Kingdom of the Antichrist (the Islamic Empire) is currently perpetrating on its own people as well as on various other people of the world. But the following news out of Syria stood out because of how the Islamists are using their own children in the Syrian civil war.

Syrian Terrorists Execute Defenseless Civilians with Machete

(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The Syrian website al-Haqiqa posted a video which is the most horrific of all videos released so far about the Syrian crisis. The tragic incident has reportedly happened in an area located between Talbisiyeh and Rastan towns in the Western Homs province. The video shows a group of Takfiri armed rebels affiliated to the so-called Free Syrian Army (FSA) who call themselves Khaled bin Walid Battalion and use children for beheading abducted citizens. The video also showed the terrorists bringing down the heads of the people on a piece of stone and beheaded them by using a machete.
The video appeared on the facebook page of Khaled bin Walid which is run by Qassem Sadeddin, a defected Syrian Air Force colonel. After the outbreak of the Syrian crisis in March 2011, some reactionary Arab states and their allies ushered in shameless efforts to strike a blow on the Middle East’s resistance axis and topple the Damascus government. Moreover, a new al-Qaeda was formed with the support of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the western countries, specially the US, in Syria.
The above countries recruit the Salafis from different countries such as Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Libya, Europe, even Afghanistan and some Central Asian countries, train them in Libya and Turkey, and eventually send them to Syria to fight President Bashar al-Assad’s government.
Terrorists have tried hard in the last several days to make Syrian cities unsafe for citizens, but the army has purged them from most neighborhoods and districts, killed tens of them and arrested many others.
Syria has been experiencing unrest since March 2011 with organized attacks by well-armed gangs against Syrian police forces and border guards being reported across the country. Hundreds of people, including members of the security forces, have been killed, when some protest rallies turned into armed clashes.
The government blames outlaws, saboteurs, and armed terrorist groups for the deaths, stressing that the unrest is being orchestrated from abroad.
If the Kingdom of the Antichrist (the Islamic Empire) can commit such atrocities against its own people, and force its own children to commit some of these horrific atrocities, what will they do, under the leadership of the Antichrist (Jesus, son of Mary of Islamic teaching) and his False Prophet (al-Mahdi), when they come for the Christians of the world?

December 10, 2012
Author: Richard Neal
Anti-contamination gear for chemical warfare

While the world media concentrated on events which unfolded over the past few months between Israel and Iran, I have kept my eyes on the Syrian civil war also because I believe the Syrian civil war could escalate into the War of Gog and Magog of bible prophecy. Eschatology – or end time prophecy is clear in that an end time coalition force made up of various Islamic armies and led by a military leader from modern Turkey will invade the modern state of Israel (Eze 38, 39). And, with events between Israel and Iran apparently calm for the moment, and the Syrian conflict apparently escalating, sadly, it looks as if my interpretation of geo-political and military events, which I lay out in great detail in my new book – Kingdom of the Antichrist, may be accurate.

For the past week, US officials have kept up a flow of leaks to the media suggesting that Syrian President Bashar Assad was on the verge of ordering his army to unleash chemical weapons. The details built up as the week went by, starting with the detection of “unusual movements” of Syrian chemical weapons units, advancing to reports that the Syrians were “mixing precursor chemicals” for the nerve gas sarin and on Thursday, Dec. 6, that bombs had been made ready with sarin gas for loading onto Syrian Air Force fighter-bombers when Assad gave the word.

Saturday, Dec. 8, British Foreign Secretary William Hague reported evidence from intelligence sources that Syria is preparing to use chemical weapons. British intelligence sources added that Syria’s chemical weapons are concentrated at five air bases and are being closely watched. They said contingency plans have been drawn up if they show signs of being readied to be loaded and used as weapons.

Who are the close watchers and what are the contingency plans? Military sources disclosed that US, Israeli, Jordanian and Turkish special forces are spread out on the ground in Syria, armed with special gear for combating chemical arms. They are close enough to count the convoys carrying canisters, shells or bombs loaded with poison gas and their reports are supplemented by orbiting US military surveillance satellites and drones able to pinpoint the position of the chemical munitions at any given moment.

It was reported Saturday that the rebels had seized a “chlorine factor” at Al Safir, the cover name for Bashar Assad’s largest chemical store and base, where he also keeps Syrian Scud D missiles armed with chemical warheads ready to fire at Israel.
The strange thing about these tactics is this: If “US officials” – military and intelligence – were able to keep track step by step of the movements of Syria’s poisonous weapons, and believe that sooner or later Assad will use them and have issued grave warnings, why didn’t they take preventive action in good time?

To date, President Barack Obama has held back from ordering an attack on the Syrian army’s chemical units – just as the Syrian ruler is abstaining from issuing the final “go” order to use those weapons. It seems that neither wants to go first. Consequently,  we seem to be witnessing a high-stake poker game between Washington and Damascus over a deck of chemical cards, each waiting to see who blinks first. If the Americans attack, Assad will feel he is justified in releasing his poisonous gas over Turkey, Jordan and Israel. But if Assad loses his nerve and lets loose with chemical weapons inside or outside Syria, the Americans will come crashing down on him with the full might of the US air, sea and marine forces standing by off the Syrian coast, along with Turkish, Israeli and Jordanian strikes against targets in Syria.

Tuesday Dec. 6, Syrian chemical weapons units positioned near the capital, Damascus were first sighted by military and intelligence personnel heading north on the road to Aleppo armed with shells loaded with nerve agents – sarin and possibly XV. Three days later, the movements continued to destinations unknown.

Intelligence experts are speculating that these convoys may be decoys for distracting attention from still- undiscovered poison gas caches. Large-scale Western naval and marines forces are therefore on elevated readiness for responding to any unexpected Syrian moves.

Those experts offer two theories about the destination of the chemicals weapons. One is that they are not destined for any of the battle fronts against the rebels, but for the Alawite Mountains; Assad is getting ready to retreat from Damascus and barricade himself in his mountain stronghold accompanied by the forces still loyal to him.  Another theory is that from the Allawite Mts. near the coast, the Syrian ruler was planning to hit American and Turkish soldiers with chemical weapons as they came ashore.

Stay tuned….

December 7, 2012
Author: Richard Neal
The USS Eisenhower in a lightning storm
The USS Eisenhower in a lightning storm
    I argue in my book that Ezekiel chapters 37, 38, 39 40 and 41 should be viewed as one long – and very detailed end time prophecy. My reasoning for this is simple; When Ezekiel penned the book we know today as the book of Ezekiel (580s B.C.) chapters, verses even consonants did not yet exist in the Hebrew language, and were only added centuries later by Hebrew scribes as these literary tools were discovered and made available. Moreover the book we know today as the book of Ezekiel is actually several books penned by the prophet, and only compiled into the one book we know it as today centuries later by the very same Hebrew scribes who broke the book up into chapter and verses where they believed these exist while, at the same time, adding the newly invented consonants of the Hebrew language as well.
   When the above is understood, chapter 37 – the rebirth of the modern state of Israel, chapters 38 and 39 - the War of Gog and Magog, and chapters 40 and 41 – the rebuilt Jewish Temple in Jerusalem become one continuous and very detailed end time prophecy which began to be fulfilled in real time in 1948 with the rebirth of the modern state of Israel and will be followed in real time by the War of Gog and Magog and the rebuilding of the third Jewish Temple in Jerusalem.
   With President Assad of Syria threatening his own country, and undoubtedly his neighbors as well, with his stockpile of chemicals weapons, Ezekiel 39: 14-15 takes on new meaning: “Men will be regularly employed [after the War of Gog and Magog has been concluded] to cleanse the land. Some will go throughout the land and, in addition to them, others will bury those that remain on the ground. At the end of the seven months [is this a possible reference to the length of the War of Gog and Magog?] they will begin their search. As they go throughout the land and one of them sees a human bone, he will set up a marker beside it until the gravediggers have buried it in the Valley of Hamon Gog (Also a town called Hamonah will be there.) And so they will cleanse the land.” Many biblical scholars have for decades seen these dead bodies littering the land of Israel as victims of a nuclear attack. I, on the other hand, see these dead bodies as being victims of chemical weapons rather than nuclear.
   Zechariah 14:12 is another classical end time prophecy that may be speaking of the same biological event during the War of Gog and Magog when he writes: “This is the plague which the Lord will strike all the nations that fought [notice the past tense] against Jerusalem: Their flesh will rot while they are still standing on their feet, their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths…” Again, many biblical scholars see this as a description of the effects of nuclear war, I, on the other hand, believe this describes chemical agents and their effects on the coalition force of Gog.
   With the above being said, it is interesting to note that American officials said Wednesday, Dec. 4, that they believed Syrian bombs had been made ready with sarin gas, but not yet loaded onto fighter planes and Syrian President Assad had not yet issued the “go” order. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned President Assad once again that he would be crossing “a red line” if he used nerve gas against the country’s rebels. But “there’s little the outside world can do to stop it.”
   In answer to US allegations, Syrian spokesmen reiterated that their government would not use chemical weapons against its own people. This statement leaves wide open the possible use of lethal gas against the countries supporting the Syrian rebels, such as Turkey and Jordan, and possibly even Israel. And indeed, the Assad regime has in the past referred to “external enemies” as possible targets of chemical warfare. This locution undoubtedly covers Israel. Yet against the flood of information and warnings coming from the United States and Israel is strangely silent and their media are officially discouraged from tracking the Syrian chemical weapons menace.
   Surprise was voiced in some Israeli defense and military quarters, when the prime minister, the defense minister and other key ministers traveled to Europe Wednesday for visits to Prague and Berlin, at a time when Israel’s northern border with Syria might be targeted for a chemical attack. Although it was only a 48-hour absence – they returned Friday – Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak are holding to an outward attitude of coolly controlling the situation, in contrast to the Turkish government which has prepared itself for possible attack – and not only with defensive measures. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu remarked Wednesday that the Syrian regime has 700 missiles whose location, storage method and holders are no secret to Ankara. Was this a veiled threat to destroy them. Prime Minister Netanyahu, on the other hand, said nothing more than the routine: “We are watching the Syrian chemical weapons with concern.”
   The USS Eisenhower Strike Group transited the Suez Canal from the Persian Gulf Saturday, Dec. 1, sailing up to the Syrian coast Tuesday in a heavy storm, with 8 fighter bomber squadrons of Air Wing Seven on its decks and 8,000 sailors, airmen and Marines. The USS Eisenhower group also joined the USS Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group which carries 2,500 Marines.
   Facing Syria now are 10,000 US fighting men, 70 fighter-bombers and at least 17 warships, including the three Iwo Jima amphibious craft, a guided missile cruiser and 10 destroyers and frigates. Four of these vessels are armed with Aegis missile interceptors. This mighty US armada brings immense pressure to bear on the beleaguered Assad regime after it survied an almost two-year buffeting by an armed uprising. Its presence indicates that the United States now stands ready for direct military intervention in the Syrian conflict when the weather permits.
   The Obama Administration views events in and around Syria as being of such an urgent nature that these navy maneuvers leave behind in the all-important Persian Gulf just one US aircraft carrier, the USS Stennis and its strike group.
   Welcoming NATO’s decision Tuesday, Dec. 4, to deploy Patriot missile batteries in Turkey, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said Wednesday: “The protection from NATO will be three dimensional; one is the short-range Patriots, the second is the middle-range Terminal High Altitude Air Defense [THAD] system and the last is the AEGIS system, which counters missiles that can reach outside the atmosphere.” Military sources have stated publicly  While the Patriot is land-based and will be deployed on the Turkish-Syrian border, the THAD and the Aegis have just reached the Syrian coast aboard the USS Eisenhower strike group. “With this integrated system,” said Davutoglu, Turkey will have maximum protection.”
   He added: “The Syrian regime has 700 missiles,” and their location, storage method and holders are no secret to Ankara. This was the first time Ankara had made threats to destroy Syrian missiles, including any carrying chemical warheads.
   It appears, that, when one considers Assad’s threat to use chemical weapons, the Syrian conflict could possibly be spreading? With Turkey (the ancient “Land of Gog and Magog) heavily involved, and now the United States entering the picture, how far will this conflict ultimately spread?…Stay tuned.

December 2, 2012
Author: Richard Neal

As I show in my new book, Kingdom of the Antichrist, end time prophecy or eschatology is broken up into three very distinct time periods, i.e., Daniel’s 70th Week, The Great Tribulation Period and The Day of the Lord’s Wrath. These time periods overlap in real time, and all three periods are concerned with three very different groups of people, i.e., Daniel’s 70the Week with the Jewish people, The Great Tribulation Period with the Church and The Day of the Lord’s Wrath with the non-repentant people and nations of the earth at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

But Scripture goes even further than simply detailing the three distinct end time or eschatological times periods referred to above. For Scripture also provides us with details regarding events which lead up to the beginning of Daniel’s 70th Week, the first eschatological time period to begin. We are speaking, of course, of the priest-prophet Ezekiel and his very detailed prophecy regarding The War of Gog and Magog (Eze 38, 39).

As I try to point out in my book, Scripture is limited by its very nature. In other words, because Scripture is a literary work, it is, therefore, confined by the limitations inherit with any literary work – limited space for details. Consequently, even though bible prophecy provides us with a remarkable array of details regarding all the various prophecies throughout Scripture, it is, nevertheless, left to the generation that is alive at the time any various prophecies are being fulfilled to discern the times and, through that discernment, to fill in the gaps that bible prophecy fails to provide us with. For example, in 33 A.D. Jesus gave His generation a very detailed prophecy concerning the upcoming annihilation of their sacred Temple in Jerusalem (70 A.D.) (Lk 19:41044). The Temple was destroyed – exactly as He had prophesied it would be, even down to the very detail that “not one stone was left upon another.” But what He didn’t tell them was that it would be the Roman’s who would destroy the Temple, and, more importantly, the many different military and political maneuvers by the various parties involved that led up to the Jewish Revolt of 70 A.D. and the destruction of the Jewish Temple and, at its essence, the physical destruction of Mosaic Judaism. And this is exactly where we, as the generation which will see all the various end time prophecies fulfilled, find ourselves today. End time prophecy began to be fulfilled in 1948 with the rebirth of the modern state of Israel (Eze 37), and today, some sixty-four years later, events in the Middle East are quickly moving – like chess pieces on a chessboard – into position for the remaining eschatological prophecies to soon play themselves out as well. So it is left to us – the generation which is alive during the fulfillment of these end time prophecies – to discern the time we live in, and to fill in the gaps regarding the many political, military and economic maneuvers by various individuals and states which will lead us to coming of the Antichrist and the end of this age and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

I have already referred to The War of Gog and Magog above. In my book I go into great detail showing how this war will reunite Daniel’s fourth “beast” or empire (Dan 7) - the Islamic Empire. How “Gog” will be the sixth king of this empire (Rev 17:10), and how his invasion of the modern state of Israel (Eze 38, 39) and its disastrous aftermath (Eze 39) will be the vehicle that will bring the Antichrist to power as the eighth king of Daniel’s fourth empire (Rev 17:11). As the eighth and final king of Daniel’s fourth empire, the Antichrist, as a result of the disastrous War of Gog and Magog, will enter into a peace treaty with Israel (Dan 9:27). The signing of this peace treaty will be the single event that begins the prophetic time clock ticking regarding the 70th Week of Daniel’s prophecy (Dan 9:27).

Many biblical scholars, myself included, believe, however, that Daniel provides us with a very detailed end time prophecy that falls in real time between Ezekiel’s prophecy regarding the rebirth of the modern state of Israel (Eze 37) in 1948 and his War of Gog and Magog (Eze 38, 39). And this prophecy, if I am interpreting it correctly, is concerned with the fourth empire of Daniel 7, specifically the political intrigue that will lead up to  its reuniting of the empire under the leadership of Gog (Eze 38).

Daniel chapter 11 is an incredibly detailed prophecy concerning “the king of the south and the king of the north.” Because of its incredible detail, many liberal biblical scholars argue that it must have been written by someone other than the prophet Daniel after the events were accomplished in the third century B.C. between the Ptolemies of Egypt (the king of the south) and the Seleucids of Syria (the king of the north). Nevertheless, many biblical scholars agree that various prophecies have two fulfillments – one within a few years the prophecy was first penned, which should be viewed as a prefigurement of the second fulfillment which will take place during the final three eschatological time periods which will make up the final seven years of this age. An example of this principle can be found in Daniel’s famous prophecy regarding the “abomination that causes desolation” act (Dan 9:27). Historians and biblical scholars alike are in agreement that this event took place in 168 B.C. when the Syrian king Antiochus Epiphanes set an image of the pagan god Zeus Olympius atop the alter of God in the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. However, Jesus Christ clearly refers to this event taking place again in the future when He says; “So when you see standing in the holy place the abomination that causes desolation spoken of through the prophet Daniel – let the reader understand – then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains…” (Matt 24:15-16).

In chapter 11 (vs. 40-45) of his detailed prophecy, the prophet Daniel writes; “At the time of the end [a biblical reference which always refers to the eschatological end of this age] the king of the south [Egypt] will engage him [the king of the north] in battle, and the king of the north will storm out against him with chariots and calvary and a great fleet of ships. He will invade many countries and sweep through them like a flood. Many countries will fall, but Edom, Moab and the leaders of Ammon [modern Jordan] will be delivered from his hand. He will extend his power over many countries; Egypt will not escape. He will gain control of the treasures of gold and silver and all the riches of Egypt, with the Libyans and the Nubians [Sudan and Ethiopia] in submission…” (Dan 11:40-45). I believe “the king of the north” is none other than the current Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and “the king of the south” is none other than the current Egyptian President Morsi. Because “the king of the north,” Erdogan, wins the battle with “the king of the south,” Morsi, Erdogan is the one who reunites the Islamic Empire and, together with various Islamic countries, invades the modern state of Israel in the War of Gog and Magog” (Eze 38, 39).

For this reason we have been keeping a close eye on events in Turkey, Israel, Egypt and the whole Middle East and North Africa since before the “Arab Spring” began and President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood came to power in Egypt. We have, as a consequence, written extensively about Prime Minister Erdogan, the deteriorating relationship between Israel and Turkey under his leadership, and Turkey’s involvement in the current Syrian civil war. Nevertheless, we have written little about Egyptian President Morsi. And because the Obama Administration and the secular liberal press in America has attempted to paint President Morsi as a democratic leader and moderate muslim, I thought it was time to introduce the followers of my blog to the real Mr. Morsi:

What do you call a leader of a theocratic and cultish movement with a deep and clear disdain for democracy who suddenly assumes dictatorial powers? A “moderate,” of course. Ever since the Muslim Brotherhood broke its promise to stay out of Egypt’s presidential election in the aftermath of the revolution, many Western observers have been in denial about what has been going on. In less than half a year, Mohammed Morsi has deftly built the foundation for despotism.

Much as the Nazis brilliantly cast themselves as reformers sweeping away the corruption of the Weimar Republic, Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood have been using the effort to clean up the detritus of Hosni Mubarak’s dictatorship as an excuse to consolidate power.

In August, when Islamists attacked Egyptian soldiers in the Sinai in an apparent effort to force Egypt into a confrontation with Israel, Morsi used the incident as an excuse to replace Mohamed Hussein Tantawi – a Mubarak-era holdover who headed the military and guarded its independence – with officers more pliable to the Brotherhood. ”Are we looking at a president determined to dismantle the machine of tyranny,” Alaa Al Aswany, a democratic activist, asked at the time, “or one who is retooling the machine of tyranny to serve his interests?” That question quickly became, at best, rhetorical. Morsi proceeded to purge scores of newspaper editors and publishers, declare himself in charge of the drafting of the new constitution and all but wore a sandwich board with the words “I’m becoming a dictator!” on it. As if to hammer it home, Morsi last week announced that his rule was immune to judicial oversight of any kind. He used the failure of the courts to adequately punish Mubarak-era holdovers as an excuse. It was just that – an excuse, not an explanation.

Morsi softened his language Monday, but aides insisted his edict stood. And the Brotherhood’s position remains clear. “If democracy means that people decide who leads them, then (we) accept it; if it means that people can change the laws of Allah and follow what they wish to follow, then it is not acceptable,” the Brotherhood explained on its website in 2005. Morsi did have another excuse for seizing power: The timing was good. Because he helped broker a cease-fire between Hamas and Israel, the White House lavished praise on him. Before the limelight dimmed, Morsi seized the moment to announce that his will is the supreme law of the land.

On the New Republic’s website, Eric Trager of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy posted a condemnation of Morsi’s apologists under the headline “Shame on Anyone Who Ever Thought Mohammed Morsi Was a Moderate.” Trager’s one error is he assumes that, after Morsi’s latest power grab, no one could possibly still think Morsi’s a moderate.

But that’s exactly what many still believe. For instance, on ABC’s “This Week” on last Sunday, Time magazine’s Joe Klein spoke for many inside the Beltway when he celebrated Morsi’s role in the truce as a “wonderful sign” because it showed he and the Muslim Brotherhood are “moderates.” Bear in mind that even as Morsi was pocketing praise from the West for yanking Hamas’ collar, Mohammed Badie, the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, made it clear that war to liberate Palestine remained its goal, once Muslim unity is achieved. Apparently, “moderation” in the Middle East has been defined down to not wanting to wage war on Israel right now.

Morsi went to prison to defend the Muslim Brotherhood’s Islamist ideology. He rose through its ranks not because he was a moderate, but because he was committed to the cause and knew how to play the game. The stakes have changed, but anyone who thinks he’s not still committed to the cause is getting played.

October 14, 2012
Author: Richard Neal

Tantamount to arriving at the correct interpretation of end time prophecies – and there is only one correct interpretation of prophetic Scripture, is a proper identification of the many prophetic characters and events which make up the eschatological paradigm presented in the pages of Scripture. And this truth can not be over emphasized.

For example, the book of Daniel speaks of four “beasts” or empires which will rule from his day (530 B.C.) until the Second Coming of Jesus Christ (Dan 7:1-28). Daniel specifically names the first three of these “beasts” or empires (Dan 2:37 – Babylon; 8:20 – the Medes and Persians; 8:21 – Alexander’s Grecian Empire) but, even though he speaks about it in great detail, as do other prophets, Daniel never specifically names the fourth “beast” or empire. Nor does any other prophet of either the Old or New Testaments. Naturally this has led to a great amount of speculation over the centuries as to the true identity of Daniel’s fourth beast, or empire.

This becomes obvious in the various teachings over the centuries concerning the identity of Daniel’s fourth empire. Because of the dominance and brutality of the Roman Empire during the first two centuries of the Christian era, for example, many of the early Church Father’s believed that Rome was the fourth empire Daniel had in mind. Many scholars of the Eastern, or Orthodox Church of the Byzantine era (600 A.D. to 1400 A.D.) believed, because of the many Islamic invasions and atrocities, that Islam was Daniel’s dreaded fourth empire. After the Protestant Reformation many in the Protestant Churches throughout Europe believed that the Catholic Church, because of its brutalities during the schismatic war, and because it controlled many lands and kings throughout Europe, was the infamous fourth empire of the book of Daniel. Other examples could be referred to, but the point is that none of these “speculations” were ever proven for various reasons. Thus none were ever accepted by all the Church. As a result, many variations of these end time paradigms are still being taught, and confusion reigns throughout the Church as a whole. more

September 14, 2012
Author: Richard Neal

As far as I am aware of, no one – Christian or otherwise – has ever successfully identified the eight kings of Revelation 17:10. Many have tried, including many of the Early Church Fathers. Because of the dominance of the Imperial Roman Empire in the first century A.D., many of those same Church Fathers tried to find the answer in successive Roman Emperors, usually beginning with the tyrant Nero.The study of eschatology or end-time prophecy came to an end within the Western Church around the fourth century A.D. when St Augustine determined that it was beyond understanding, and even dangerous. The study of eschatological prophecies was renewed with the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century A.D. The early Reformers, and those that followed them, usually picked up where the Early Church Fathers left off since they were well acquainted  with their writings and saw, as a result, various Imperial Roman Emperors as the fulfillment of the prophecy. That there were literally hundreds of Imperial Roman Emperors didn’t seem to be enough to deter most interpreters; they simply picked the Emperors who they believed better fit their paradigm, then named those specific emperors as the fulfillment of the prophecy of the eight kings.Regardless of the sincerity of the various theologians and apologists who have attempted, over the centuries, to interpret the prophecy, sadly, error usually begets error, and by the early nineteenth century A.D. a quasi-Revised Roman Empire had grown out of the attempts to force Imperial Roman Emperors into the fulfillment of the prophecy which is Revelation 17:10. This led directly to other misinterpretations of other eschatological prophecies. The end result, sadly, has been the Church as a whole has been misled and, as a result, “can not see the forrest for the errors.” Today the Church, especially in America, looks for an eschatological paradigm where some form of a quasi-Revised Roman Empire (the Fourth Beast of Daniel 7) becomes the vehicle which allows the Antichrist to come to power; usually through the United Nations. Gog, of the land of MaGog is, in many of these same paradigms, is usually the Russians (formerly the atheistic Soviet Union), and in extreme Protestant circles the Roman Catholic Church becomes “Mystery Babylon” of Revelation 17, the heretical religion of the great Beast which is the Kingdom (Empire) of the Antichrist, etc.

Any eschatological paradigm can – and must! – be tested. Just as scientific theories must be tested before they are accepted as truth, eschatological paradigms must also be tested before they are ever accepted as truth. And the way to test any eschatological paradigm is simple - all eschatological prophecies from both the Old and New Testaments must fit into the new paradigm without being forced.  For example, one can not attempt to trace the migration of the ancient people known as the Scythians throughout the many centuries, which is virtually impossible since the history of their migrations is incomplete, simply because one believes that the Scythians were the original inhabitants of “The Land of MaGog” and, over the centuries, eventually migrated into Russia. Thus, Russia, of their preconceived beliefs, must be “the Land of Magog.” more

Categories

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

RSS RSS feed